tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-42609545143044236652023-06-29T05:40:15.021-07:00Christian News BriefsA place where ministers can drop in and explore motivating articles, connect to web sites and blogs and get ideas for ministry and other service.Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-7895293002643702942013-07-18T15:01:00.001-07:002013-07-18T15:01:37.935-07:00Naming His Grace: Facing Racism and Heresy in the African American Community -part 2<a href="http://naminghisgrace.blogspot.com/2009/03/facing-racism-and-heresy-in-african_16.html">Naming His Grace: Facing Racism and Heresy in the African American Community -part 2</a>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-44933277234078371882012-07-10T09:38:00.001-07:002012-07-10T09:47:27.246-07:00“A Slave Family in the Old South”: Historical Reconstruction, Revisionism,or Something New?Bernell Wesley
History 3210
July 9, 2012
This is a recent 19th. Century US History "Reader Response Paper" Assignment. History Professors always assign papers that are inline with their particular specialties. It just so happens Tennessee Tea Party is pushing rewriting History. If Republicans win this is likely to happen.
Introduction
The primary argument, I believe, is that Sally Thomas could buy “freedom” for her three bi-racial sons, yet remain enslaved in pre-civil war Tennessee could not possibly be invented. However, this argument leads to a series of questions whereby such an invention might be contemplated. For example, the editors tell us the authors “have uncovered a remarkable story”. But, later in the book (Franklin, Schweninger, Sources, 262) we are told that John Hope Franklin became curator of the Thomas Documents in 1948. So, we are led to believe that these important documents remained in archives for more than five decades. The obvious question of course is why would such “a remarkable story” remain “uncovered” for 50 years? Another important argument is what might be called evidenced-assertion i.e. that although the Thomas-Rapier family was the “exception” they were not alone, because “Nashville offered good opportunities for a few privileged blacks” (Franklin, Schweninger, 14), and that there are other narratives just as exciting waiting to be written. If there are other similar unwritten slave narratives could exception be the best word to describe the Thomas-Rapier experiences or should rare be a better descriptor? The authors listed several examples such as Robert (Black Bob) Rentfro who owned a food and liquor business, Sophy, a free “mulatto woman and Temperance Crutcher, a born slave who later was able to “petition” and win her freedom in 1837 (Franklin, Schweninger, 14). Assertions maybe appropriate for fiction but employed in
Wesley 2
historical narrative they lead to more questions, questions that are more distraction than (signposts) leads to uncovering historical relevance, i.e. – who were Black Bob’s suppliers? Did he make his own liquor or was it made locally by someone else? Who would want to supply a man of color? Again, why introduce In Search of The Promised Land more than fifty years after the documents were remitted to John Hope Franklin especially since the editor James West Davidson had been an advocate of “new narratives” (Barry Mehler, see Conclusion) since the early 80’s? The pervasive theme of In Search of the Promised Land was the introduction of a new technique of retelling slave narratives by reconstructuring primary documents using what I call secondary - primary documents (examples are court records, affidavits and other primary documents not written by the subjects) as narrative fillers, a mixture of biographical sketch written like historical fiction, first person bravado, and “detective work”. For example, embellishments such as telling the reader how a character “thinks “or allowing the character to speak with more believable authority than was common for the time, “During the winter I have spent several weeks in this the city of fires with A young gentleman who has more money than he wants and is anxious for me to help him use it” (Franklin, Schweninger, 166). This type of narrative could be considered Revisionist but in a different way, it allows the subject to re-interpret history instead of the historian; as a technique it shifts the burden of proof from the historian to the subject and allows the subject to redefine him or herself based on their individual experiences. This “new narrative” makes it possible to conceive of different levels of enslavement and freedom.
Wesley 3
Sources
Many of the primary sources were either missing or lost. Consistency in presentation such as numbering pages was also a problem as was identifying the author of the “partial autobiography” (Franklin, Schweninger, 262). Although it is recorded that the Thomas-Rapier Papers were given to John Hope Franklin in 1948, to be remanded to “a negro University” Howard University Moorland-Spingarn Research Center does not list them as a gift until 1957. Where were the documents for 9 years? Overall, the authors made use of a wide variety of “additional primary sources” in developing “interpretative breath”; probate court petitions, census records, state, local, and federal documents, almost any legal documents of the period, it seems, were rich sources of information.
Analysis
The most striking comparisons between In Search of the Promised Land and the Online Primary Reader Documents are found in Primary Source Document #3 in Agriculture and Slavery in the South at Midcentury. Virginian, George Fitzhugh, wrote in 1854, that slavery was a “positive good” and a source of Southern pride. James Thomas reflecting on his “travels in the North and West” also extolled the many Southern advantages he enjoyed and the utter “humiliation” he experienced during his travels with Andrew Jackson Polk; not being able to visit museums, theatres or other cultural venues or the fact that he was openly “ridiculed” in public; experiences that were foreign to him as a Southern free slave. James Thomas concluded
Wesley 4
that he would rather live as a sort of free man in Tennessee than to escape to New York (Franklin, Schweninger, 78, 79).
Conclusion
There is too much incongruence within the narrative. Readers are introduced to “virtual freedom” and “quasi” slaves. Readers are given examples of virtual freedom through the lives of Black Bob, the liquor seller and Sophy, a wheeling and dealing “mulatto woman” but virtual slave is never defined. However, quasi slave is defined as a sort of privileged slave “who had not obtained a formal deed” of freedom. Hence, the ambiguity of freedom for enslaved people, with or without documents of freedom. The fact that James Thomas a “respected” free slave could be “summoned” by a white man and not refuse him his service is also strangely inconsistent within the narrative as well as traditional historical slave narratives. The mere fact that Andrew Jackson Polk could buy James Thomas’ property legally by force and “shut it up” is a stark reinforcement of the infamous Dred Scott Decision that Black people have no rights that white people are bound to respect.
Can a narrative be invented or reinvented from primary sources? It is certainly possible. In order to better understand how In Search of The Promised Land relates to traditional narrative about slavery and why a “new American History narrative” was necessary I decided to explore the concept of “new narratives in American History” series by examining at least one of the editors of the series and each of the authors of In Search of the Promised Land. I chose two reviews of monographs in order to establish evidence. The first was written by Barry Mehler of Ferris State University Institute For The
Wesley 5
Study of Academic Racism on ‘They Say” Ida B. Wells and the Reconstruction of Race, a 2007 work by James West Davidson, one of the editors of In Search of the Promised Land and the second monograph was the 2000 Lincoln Prize Acceptance Speech by John Hope Franklin and Loren Schweninger. As stated in my introduction Davidson began advocating “narrative history” in the early 80’s. Davidson’s technique in “They Say” was to write about Ida B. Wells without writing a biography. Davidson accomplished this by using an “epigraph” of James Baldwin, which simply states: “If I am not what you say I am, then you are not who you think you are”, in order to examine how Blacks redefined themselves after the Civil War and in so doing redefined white people as well. Empowered, Blacks declared that how whites had once defined them was no longer acceptable, therefore who whites said they were was equally unacceptable. Paradoxically, this “crisis” of American identity required a fresh narrative, a fresh collaboration. Franklin and Schweninger was the perfect couple to extend Davidson’s “new narratives”.
Franklin and Schweninger had worked closely together since the 60’s. Franklin had even supervised Schweninger’s dissertation James T. Rapier and Reconstruction but neither had ever written a complete “full length historical study”. Concentrating on “runaway slaves” Franklin and Schweninger discovered something very interesting; most slaves escaped to nearby plantations, or remained in the same “area as their owners”. However, although most slaves never really “escaped” their punishment upon recapture was often brutal and “sadistic” (‘They Say’). Viewing some of the gruesome documents made Davidson “uncomfortable”, but instead of confronting his uncomfort, he, like most whites suppressed it.
New Narratives in American History has opened the door to the exploration of the “psychology of white Americans (Mehler) especially in dealing with racial issues. Can New Narratives in American History be exploited negatively? Of course, but I believe the positive aspects of this approach just might
Wesley 6
be the catalyst for the paradigm shift that can usher in the racial healing America so badly needs. To paraphrase a Biblical aphorism that encapsulates New Narratives in American History: new wine should never be put in old wineskins – Matthew 9:17.Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-11870288421571827952010-08-11T09:50:00.000-07:002010-08-11T09:50:53.632-07:00Do Your research Before You Commit To A Cell Based (Small Groups) Church<embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" id="VideoPlayback" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=3767464798291138426&hl=en&fs=true" style="height: 326px; width: 400px;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> </embed>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-3532948782085725022010-06-24T08:21:00.000-07:002010-06-24T08:21:24.111-07:00Clayton proposal to cut every employee's pay brings protests | ajc.com<a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/clayton/clayton-proposal-to-cut-555247.html?cxtype=rss_clayton">Clayton proposal to cut every employee's pay brings protests ajc.com</a>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-46015891000763725482010-05-13T21:02:00.000-07:002010-05-13T21:02:00.176-07:00Free Classifieds - Metro Atlanta Handyman Service - Atlanta, Georgia - Join Ads<a href="http://us.joinads.com/59/posts/3-Services/43-Home-Services/118171-Metro-Atlanta-Handyman-Service.html">Free Classifieds - Metro Atlanta Handyman Service - Atlanta, Georgia - Join Ads</a>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-30843516323895835202010-05-05T14:52:00.000-07:002010-05-05T14:52:34.810-07:00The Dishonest Steward: Luke 16:1-15Then you will know the truth and the truth will set you free<br />
John 8:32<br />
<br />
This parable is said to be one of the hardest to teach or explain. On the surface it is about a dishonest steward who is found out. He then manipulates the accounts in his favor in order to appease his master. The Bible says we are slaves to whatever controls us. This dishonest steward was enslaved to his passions to amass wealth for himself by using his office of steward to conceal his "iniquity". The only skills the steward had was being a steward but because he did not respect his master he was eventually brought to account for his failure as a steward. The Bible says this steward "couldn't dig and was ashamed to beg". He couldn't do manual labor and he was full of pride, so asking, begging for help was out of the question. <br />
<br />
This parable is about trust and accountability. It's about judgement. The master trusts that the steward will have his best interests at heart. Until it is brought to his attention (by some or they) the master has no reason to doubt his steward. Some or they, depending on which translation is being referred to, means the same. Co-stewards. These fellow stewards went to the master. The Bible tells us to worry about nothing and pray about everything. Philippians 4:6. So, we don't confront pastors or preachers outright when we observe something that does not line up to The Word but instead we make our requests known to God on our knees. Did you know that in some cultures preacher and pastor are different offices with different functions. For example in the Chinese church a preacher must prove that he is capable of leading the church before he is considered a pastor and a preacher is restricted in that he cannot administer sacrament, holy communion or baptism. You have to prove that you are trustworthy. The European (Greek, Roman) church confused the offices in that they understand all offices to be the same with different functions. A bishop and elder are not equal but their function is considered the same. In the natural the parts of the body are different with different functions. Hands and feet are different and serve a different purpose. Promotion in the modern church too often is based on how well you meet the criteria set by the title holders in the church. 1 Timothy 4:14 is an overview of the standards of biblical promotion. Modern stewards (pastors) many times are groomed to inherit churches, congregations and lands as an inheritance package. In Acts 16 Paul meets Timothy for the first time, begins to groom him, sets himself up as Timothy's "spiritual father" against the admonition of Jesus Christ himself who said in Matthew 23:9 - And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. He then ordains and makes Timothy Bishop of Ephesus. Were the other Apostles consulted? When Judas was replaced the apostles acted only under the unction of the Holy Spirit after conferring among themselves. The practice of church appointments is Pauline in its origin and can be traced back to the church of Acts and its first bishop Timothy.<br />
<br />
The modern church has taught inheritance totally out of Biblical context. A good man leaves an inheritance for his children's children, but a sinner's wealth is stored up for the righteous. Proverbs 13:22. 1 Peter 1:4 says our inheritance is kept in heaven. Inheritance and wealth are two different things according to Proverbs 13:22. Biblical inheritance is heavenly, spiritual and eternal. Wealth is earthly and temporal. We (believers) are admonished to use the wealth that sinners trust in. We don't chase wealth like the unGodly. If we are living in the perfect Will of God, God will cause wealth to find us. <br />
<br />
Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered a rich man claiming to want salvation. Jesus replied; "No one is good-except God alone. You know the commandments: 'Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, do not defraud, honor your father and mother.'" Mark 10:17-22. "Teacher," he declared, "all these I have kept since I was a boy."<br />
<br />
Jesus looked at him and loved him. "One thing you lack," he said. "Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."At this the man's face fell. He went away sad, because he had great wealth.<br />
<br />
One commentator has observed this: being an elite, the dishonest steward had never really wanted for anything, therefore he was at a disadvantage for committing to true service as an honest steward. Why? It's easy to keep the commandments if you have never been tempted materially to break them. That's why Jesus presented him with a challenge that he had never encountered before. Give up the stuff that makes you comfortable and happy. And, if you pastors and preachers, really want to learn to be the kind of stewards that the master approves of you have to give up amassing earthly wealth as an inheritance. The Kingdom of God is not a Mom-and-Pop shop or family business. You expect your congregation to give out of their poverty while you live like a pastor. You can't continue to live above your congregation . As the sheperds you have to find a way either to live in the pasture with your sheep or bring them up to where you are. God has promised He will change the sheperds for some that are willing to lead His sheep according to His Word. Jeremiah 23. As always seek ya first The Kingdom Of God and don't worry about the rest...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-72087137301477002172009-09-28T13:20:00.000-07:002009-09-30T11:01:37.254-07:00Modern Stoicism,Epicureanism and The Religion Of OprahWhat has been will be again,<br /><br />what has been done will be done again;<br /><br />there is nothing new under the sun<br /><br />Ecclesiastes 1:9<br /><br /><br /><br />See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ.<br /><br />Colossians 2:8<br /><br /><br /><br />Epicureanism is a system of <a title="Philosophy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy">philosophy</a> based upon the teachings of <a title="Epicurus" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicurus">Epicurus</a> (c. 341–c. 270 BC), founded around 307 BC. Epicurus was an <a title="Atomism" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism">atomic</a> <a title="Materialism" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism">materialist</a>, following in the steps of <a title="Democritus" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus">Democritus</a>. His <a title="Materialism" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism">materialism</a> led him to a general attack on superstition and divine intervention. Following <a title="Aristippus" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristippus">Aristippus</a>—about whom very little is known—Epicurus believed that the greatest good was to seek modest pleasures in order to attain a state of tranquility and freedom from fear (<a title="Ataraxia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ataraxia">ataraxia</a>) as well as absence of bodily pain (<a title="Aponia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aponia">aponia</a>) through knowledge of the workings of the world and the limits of our desires. The combination of these two states is supposed to constitute happiness in its highest form. Although Epicureanism is a form of <a title="Hedonism" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism">hedonism</a>, insofar as it declares pleasure as the sole intrinsic good, its conception of absence of pain as the greatest pleasure and its advocacy of a simple life make it different from "hedonism" as it is commonly understood.<br /><br /><a href="http://wikipedia.org/">http://wikipedia.org/</a><br /><br />Basic "hedonism" (lust) does not lead to "happiness in its highest form". Lust leads to physical, emotional and spiritual degeneration. Hedonism is the opposite of suffering, something a cross-bearing Christian is supposed to welcome. The philosophy of hedonism is the belief that "pleasure" is the most important thing in life. Hence, the belief that everything is acceptable bewteen consenting adults. In a <a href="http://youtube/">http://youtube/</a> presentation Oprah not only proudly denounces Jesus Christ but claims she is a "christian". A Christian is a follower of Jesus Christ not someone who denies Him. She is a follower of Eckhart Tolle, a high school drop out New Age author and modern wizard. He has taken every modern "religion", dropped them in his philosophical pot and convinced far too many that he is enlightened. The Bible teaches us that the "spirit of antichrist" is among us. The Bible also teaches us to - Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. II Timothy 2:15 . Too many Christians misunderstand the scriptures and therefore rely on the safety of The Word to protect them from the "wiles of the devil". How does one rightly divide the word of truth. By practicing a relationship with Jesus Christ Amen through The Holy Spirit.<br /><br />With all the influence Oprah has she lacks the ability to study for herself. It seems that she instead finds people with whom she agrees and then promotes them. If Oprah knew anything about philosophy she would have known that Eckhart Tolle was bringing nothing new to the table but instead was presenting old philosophies (Stoicism and Epicureanism) to a modern philosophy challenged audience. It's unfortunate that The Bible, the greatest book ever written , is not taken more seriously by modern so-called educated people. When The Bible states that there is nothing new under the sun or to stay away from "deceptive philosophy" it is clear that God in His infinite Wisdom is in complete control of His Creation and all the Eckhart Tolles or Oprahs have no clue...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-22240185182380514132009-09-19T14:15:00.000-07:002009-09-19T14:15:19.067-07:00History Of The Trinity - Zionism - Zimbio<a href="http://www.zimbio.com/Zionism/articles/dYE-742upRQ/History+Of+The+Trinity">History Of The Trinity - Zionism - Zimbio</a>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-12564290869577695232009-03-17T16:13:00.000-07:002009-03-17T16:13:27.385-07:00Stoned-Campbell Disciple: Philip Jenkins, The Lost History of Christianity: A Review<a href="http://stoned-campbelldisciple.blogspot.com/2008/11/philip-jenkins-lost-history-of.html">Stoned-Campbell Disciple: Philip Jenkins, The Lost History of Christianity: A Review</a>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-56197864166456233902009-02-07T13:25:00.000-08:002009-02-07T15:51:18.816-08:00Whenever I hear "first lady" in recognition of a pastors' wife, I cringe. Not only is this not Biblical but in many respects I believe it is separatist, elitest and a hinderance to Church growth. Who was the first to find it necessary to use such a title? And, why is it a "black church" practice? The title also implies rank and order when The Bible specifically teach that God is no respecter of "persons".<br />Acts 10:34-35.<br /><br />One of the major problems of modern Church is that we have a tendency to add to The Word of God wherever it best suits our purpose. We forget Revelation 22:18 which forbids anyone adding to The Words of The Book. We are all, who confess Jesus The Christ Amen to be our Lord and Saviour, servants. Nothing more nor nothing less. God does not see us as Reverend, Dr. Pastor so-and-so and first lady. He sees us as servants. How this looks in The Spirit is quite ludicrious. Say, several different congregations all "honor" first ladies. Who is the first lady of the first ladies and who determines this order and by what criteria? Is it maybe judged by who has the largest congregation, or maybe who receives the most tithe? You see where this goes.<br /><br />Then the problem of approachability arises. Is there certain circumstances when a first lady should not be approached? Hebrews 5:4 teaches that no man shall take honor unto himself but honor unto man is bestowed by God. Religion causes so called Christians to pervert The Word of God to satisfy personal lusts and desires. Seeking a true relationship with The Father on the other hand purges us and requires self judgement.Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-19922651914285237422008-11-25T17:57:00.000-08:002009-02-28T14:19:27.603-08:00<a href="http://xyz.freeweblogger.com/stats/1/1227663626/" target="_top"><img alt="free hit counter" src="http://xyz.freeweblogger.com/counter/index.php?u=1227663626&s=7seg" vspace="2" align="middle" border="0" hspace="4" /></a><script src="http://xyz.freeweblogger.com/counter/script.php?u=1227663626"></script><br /><br /><a style="font-size: 12px;" href="http://www.freeweblogger.com/" target="_top">hit counter</a>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-63179524252259891172008-08-16T12:34:00.000-07:002008-08-18T14:45:31.956-07:00Practicing Discernment<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">For The time has come for judgement to begin at the House of God. 1 Peter 4:17<br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">It seems that Gods' Church is scattered with new church pastors, ministers, bishops, prophets, prophetesses ( this last one definitely doesn't sound right) teachers, evangelists, apostles and many neo-titles forming as quickly as new congregations. Sometimes troops need rallying in the heat of battle. It's called "raising the standard".<br /> <br /> <span style="font-style: italic;">" When the enemy shall come in like a flood,<br /> the Spirit of the Lord shall lift up a standard<br /> against him." <span style="font-weight: bold;">Isaiah 59:19</span><br /><br />True practicing disciples of Jesus must practice discernment <span style="font-weight: bold;">( Ezra 4:1-3)</span>. We must work at living the Christian Life. It's not something one gets second-hand. We must "try the spirits" <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />( 1 John 4:1). </span>We can only learn discernment by studying The Bible and meditation on The Word of God. True discernment can only come from The Spirit of God and cannot be understood with mere intellect. <span style="font-weight: bold;">(1 Corinth. 2:14).</span><br /></span></span></span>Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-70838079343144422032008-08-07T15:30:00.000-07:002008-08-08T21:53:22.729-07:00The Hypocracy Of Peter and Paul: Checking Our Own Eyes for Beams and Camels<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">God has bound all men over to disobedience so that He may have Mercy on them all </span>Romans 11:32<br /><br /><br />In Acts 16:3 we see Paul as he meets Timothy for the first time. A product of a mixed marriage, a Jewish mother and a Greek father Paul sees great potential in this uncircumcised (Hellenized) Jew. Timothy became Pauls' "son in the faith" and later as Timothy's "spiritual father" Paul ordained and established him as Bishop of Ephesus in the year 65. However, a careful study of the relationship between Paul and Timothy reveals much by The Power of The Holy Spirit. Listen as Paul speaks in 2 Timothy 3:14 But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All that Timothy knew of the Scriptures he no doubt learned from his mother and grandmother. But there is more. Paul either performed or arranged for Timothy to be circumcised. The idea that a Jewish boy could be urshered into manhood by a recent acquaintance ( Paul) is reprehensible. It was a fathers' duty either to perform or arrange for a son to be circumcised not some recently arrived in town stranger. 2 Timothy 3:14 strongly implies that not only wasTimothy taught the scriptures by two very domineering women; his mother and grandmother, but, in so doing they were knowingly grooming him to be prominent in the young growing Church. Paul had Timothy circumcised so that he would not bring "reproach" to the Jews. But, wouldn't the local Jews know Timothys' home situation. And why would this matter since Paul was "preaching" The Gospel of Grace outside The Law?<br /><br />Later on Paul confronts the hypocracy of Peter (Galatians 2:11) . Paul accuses Peter of compromising his position for refusing to eat with Gentiles to the reproach of Jews. So, is Paul less a hypocrite than Peter? Is Pauls' compromising position less compromising than Peters'? Not at all. What this study illustrates is that both are human because "everyone is an hypocrite and an evildoer, and every mouth speaketh folly" (Isaiah 9:17) . I now understand 1 Timothy 2:12-14 and why he admonishes women to remain silent and submissive . Bible teaches that all have fallen short of the Glory of God, even Peter, Paul and Timothyl. Stay Blessed in Jesus name Amen...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com14tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-53439835702506987742008-08-05T14:04:00.000-07:002008-08-05T19:27:45.631-07:00The Courageous ChurchThough we haven't met yet I love this brother already. His name is Pastor Shaun King. It's his Jesus Bold in your face work. I stumbled upon his blog a few weeks ago and was intrigued that embodies he so many that I ascribe to. Joshua, because he is taking territory. Then there is Nehemiah because he is restoring the breach in the sphere that God has given him. In Hebrew ( Nekh- em-yaw) Nehemiah comes from the root word (nacham) meaning "consolation of Jah" or to repent or comfort. This brother is like like, Gods' newest secret weapon, a young super-prophet, an inner city strongholds giant killing word slinging ... Ok! but just check him out for yourself. He exudes Joy Of The Lord. It's contagious. Pastor Shaun makes you want to start working at your house. Get that food pantry started, opening that old house up for homeless outreach. I Love you Jesus and I thank you for warriors like Shaun. Just look over to the right of this post and click on the link with Superman in the text or go straight there <a href="http://www.shauninthecity.com/blog/">www.shauninthe city.com/blog/</a>. I pray that you continue to bless him, his family and all the work you have assigned him in Jesus name Amen...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-63740883424817661372008-08-01T20:05:00.000-07:002008-08-13T14:46:24.628-07:00Divine Order From The Bottom Up: Titles In The ChurchJesus taught us many things about His Church. Notice I said His Church. There is a fundamental difference between His Church and the church. A Fresh Wind is blowing and those who are not firmly planted on The Rock Will Be Blown Away ( Psalm 1:4) . This Wind is blowing in with Divine Order From The Bottom Up . Matthew 5, The Beatudes describes those who are chosen to inherit the Promises of I Am Amen and His Kingdom. They are "the poor in spirit", "those who mourn", those who need to be "comforted", "the meek", "those who hunger and thirst for righteousness", "the merciful", "the pure in heart", "the peace makers", "those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake", who are "reviled" are spoken "evil" of and "falsely" accused because of Jesus. But, todays' title holders in the Church, the "pastor", the "reverend", those who blindly seek after spiritual fathers condemn themselves because The Word says: "Do not call anyone on earth your father", for as one translation says; " you travel land and sea to win one proselyte and when he is won, you make him twice the son of hell as yourselves" Matthew 23.<br /><br />He Who Is Alfa and Omega says this to you by His servant: you pastors, shabluwl (shab-lool) in the Hebrew, snail, as if floating in its own slime, will continue to be a shobel (Hebrew for, a ladies train) trailing after your first ladies until you openly repent. Where did the tradition of first lady start? It is divisive as it sets the pastors' wife above other sisters in Christ? Go back to Matthew 23:8 and see what The Word Of The Lord says concerning titles: Do not allow yourselves to be called Teachers because we are all brothers". In other Word since Our Lord is no respecter of men ( Acts10:34, Romans 2:11) abandon the titles and replace them with a servants attribute; servant or minister, with a little m. As for reverend, it is an Holy Attribute of Jesus Christ and is even more critical than the other titles (Psalm111:9) not to be used. Reverend is used as a title of respect by modern "clergy" . Although all un-Biblical titles are prideful " Reverend" is blasphemous as it is impious against God. Reverend literally means " to be afraid, stand in awe". The word implies preeminence , beyond and above . The word Reverend is an Old English term expressed in degrees, for example Right, Very, Most Reverend. Stay Blessed Stay in The Word...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-20793450244266686272008-07-29T16:36:00.000-07:002008-08-15T17:40:34.037-07:00Spiritual Warfare In The Modern ChurchJoseph and Potiphar's wife Gen. 39:14, Samson and Delilah Judges 16:4-21 and Jezebel and Ahab 1 Kings 16:30. What do these three Old Testament love stories have in common? Each presents The Church with a powerful familiar spirit, a demon, working in the lives of women against the order established by Almighty God. The spirit of Potiphar's wife is the scorned spirit, the rejected lying adulterous spirit, that utterly destroys innocent lives and moves on as if nothing has happened. We all know the story. A wife so taken by the handsome young house-boy that she will have him in her husband's bed. When he rejects her advances she lies and says he tried to rape her. Her husband has him put in prison where he is all but forgotten until God intervenes.<br />Then there is Samson and Delilah. Delilah in Hebrew means weak. Yet she causes the destruction of the most powerful man who had ever lived. Delilah's is a seducing, nagging, you don't love me because you don't respect me enough to tell me your innermost secrets spirit. After Samson's secret of the honey is revealed he tells the Philistines that they would never have guessed the correct answer if they had not known his "heifer" intimately. Then there is Ahab a weak King of Israel that marries Jezebel, the daughter of a high priest of Baal, for political reasons. She is inhabited by the most vicious spirit of all. A dominating, controlling, murdering spirit that hates Gods' order and those who serve God. These spirits are called "ruler spirits".<br /><br /><blockquote></blockquote>Ruler spirits are those that appear as strong women. Notice I say appear. Because truly strong women in Christ don't have a problem with men taking the lead in their families. The characteristics of ruler spirits are basically the same. Whether in the home,The Church or the work place. Does something as impersonal as a t.v. program easily escalate into a disagreement that's not an argument but with obvious tension to get a point across a flash point? Do you have days or weeks where you rarely have a civil conversation but the phone rings and the conversation is light. You reprimand the kids and she (it) "reprimands" you in front of them. What about your "church"? Are women controlling your church? Most Modern Churches are men deficient and for good reasons. In the coming weeks we will explore, research and eventually offer real solutions to destroy all "ruler spirits". By the Power of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ we declare victory in Jesus name Amen...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-54725064983229339492008-07-16T14:04:00.000-07:002008-08-07T18:03:48.069-07:00Community Outreach: BikesforBirthdaysBikesforBirthdays has been active in the Atlanta Georgia Metro area for a few years. We give bikes to kids (with parental permission)whose parents cannot afford to buy one.Last year we were contacted by DFACS (Department of Family and Children Services)to take part in their annual Christmas program. We were able to bless two kids with bikes. We have also given bikes to a local organization of grandparents that are raising their grandchildren. Individuals are welcome. We just need a month in advance on orders. Visit us at<a href="http://squidoo.com/BikesforBirthdays"> http://squidoo.com/BikesforBirthdays</a> or leave a donation. Thanks and God Bless...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-37441426544353698002008-07-12T15:52:00.000-07:002008-08-06T12:11:26.821-07:00The Cost To Follow ChristSacrifice, obedience, committment. Luke 9:14. Becoming a slave to righteousness. Romans 6:18 I say or write nothing here based own what I think or my opinion. I have not posted because I have been studying to show myself approved. In the coming weeks, months, however The Holy Spirit directs I will list some points of interest serious disciples can latch onto to clarify focus, and motivate new and different directions. A study of Matthew 18:15-16 is witness to what Jesus expects from His Church. We are to pray for and allow Holy Spirit to focus our attention away from ourself. Even our best can sometimes end up as prideful religious exercises. Like that homeless person you just brought home for a bath and a meal, then took him/her to the bus or train station enroute to a better life, that you so unselfishly paid for. But, you told others what you had done so that they might see your lead and jumpstart their own ministry quests. But were your motives pure. This scenario recently played out in my life. After about a week and out of more than $150 the drug addict turned up once again to test my Christian heart. You don't learn to walk on water from inside the boat. And whenever we take our eyes off Jesus we begin to sink, but Jesus will not allow us to perish but learn. We do serve an Awesome God A mighty Savour. Email or drop a comment. Your input is necessary for the Church Body. Check out Disciples' Corner as well as all the connections in the sidebar. Continued Blessings in in the Mighty and Awesome name Jesus Amen...Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4260954514304423665.post-50318043983678864522007-11-16T04:15:00.000-08:002007-11-16T04:44:54.889-08:00The Golden CompassIn a reprise of John Milton's <a href="http://paradiselost.org/">http://paradiselost.org/</a> Philip Pullman's <a href="http://goldencompassmovie.com/">http://goldencompassmovie.com</a> has hatched an epic atheist attack on the minds of Christian children . The movie is scheduled to hit the world on December 7 this year. According to Pullman, "original sin is a lie, and God is an ancient fallen angel who has perpetrated a creationist con on the human race, wickedly exploited by a viciously inquisitional church". The assult gets much worse and the symbolism is diabolic. Pullman evokes daemons, more than 300,000 according to the movie's web site.Chaplain Bernell Wesleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04709608300559877883noreply@blogger.com3